Public records project
Massachusetts Student Settlement Records Project
Tracking how public school districts resolve student-related educational disputes — district by district.
Parent Data Force is sending the same focused public-records request across Massachusetts to better understand how school districts resolve student-related educational disputes. We are asking for final written settlement and resolution agreements from September 18, 2021 to the present, with student-identifying information redacted as required by law.
Last updated: September 22, 2026
Why this project exists
Parent Data Force is sending substantially the same Massachusetts Public Records Law request to public school districts across the Commonwealth. The request seeks final or executed student-related agreements entered into, finalized, materially amended, or extended from September 18, 2021 through the date of each district’s response. The project currently covers 40 districts.
The request asks for final written agreements that resolve or memorialize student-related educational disputes — settlement agreements, resolution agreements, MOUs and MOAs, mediation agreements, stipulations and consent agreements, side agreements, material amendments and addenda, and other final written agreements. It covers both special-education and general-education disputes, including placement, services, evaluations, eligibility, accommodations, compensatory education, tuition and reimbursement, transportation, extended school year, discipline and exclusion, access to programming, bullying and harassment, discrimination, civil-rights complaints, and enrollment.
The request expressly excludes personally identifiable student information; staff and employment settlements; collective-bargaining and employee grievance matters; personnel discipline and separation matters; workers’ compensation; vendor, procurement, construction, and property disputes; and unrelated commercial matters. Districts may redact student names and other legally protected identifiers.
A statewide comparison can help show how student-related disputes are resolved, what remedies are used, how districts respond to public-records requests, and whether recurring patterns emerge. We do not claim a pattern until records actually support it, and we clearly distinguish what was requested, what a district said, and what the produced records show.
What we are requesting
Each district receives a request for final or executed written agreements that resolve or memorialize student-related educational disputes, regardless of title:
- Settlement agreements and settlement-and-release agreements
- Resolution agreements
- Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs)
- Mediation agreements
- Stipulations, consent agreements, or agreements for judgment/resolution
- Side agreements and side letters
- Amendments, addenda, extensions, or material attachments to such agreements
- Any other final written agreement resolving a student-related educational dispute
We are not requesting personally identifiable student information. The request expressly allows districts to redact student names, parent/guardian names where identifying, addresses, student numbers, dates of birth, and other personally identifiable information protected by law.
Live district tracker
40 districts have received the request. Use the search box or the status filters to narrow the table. Every row renders without JavaScript; the controls only enhance it.
| District | Submitted | Expected initial response | Status | Latest public note | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amesbury Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | An automatic reply announced a superintendent transition; no substantive response yet. | — |
| Amherst-Pelham Regional School District | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Andover Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | An automatic out-of-office reply was received; no substantive response yet. | — |
| Ashland Public Schools | Sep 19, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt confirmed through Ashland’s public records portal (request #26-548). | — |
| Athol-Royalston Regional School District | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Berlin-Boylston Regional School District | Sep 19, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt acknowledged; awaiting substantive response. | — |
| Beverly Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Braintree Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Superintendent confirmed receipt of the request. | — |
| Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Brockton Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Cambridge Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt confirmed by the City of Cambridge Law Department. (Request #P262427-092126) | — |
| Dracut Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| East Bridgewater Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Fairhaven Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | An automatic reply was received from the Superintendent’s office; no records-office acknowledgment yet. | — |
| Fall River Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Freetown-Lakeville Regional School District | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Gloucester Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt confirmed through Gloucester’s public records portal (request #26-683). | — |
| Grafton Public Schools | Sep 22, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Greenfield Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Hopedale Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Hopkinton Public Schools | Sep 19, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt acknowledged; awaiting substantive response. | — |
| Lexington Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Acknowledged | Acknowledged by the district’s Records Access Officer; a fee estimate may follow. The initial send bounced on an incorrect address and was re-sent to the district’s published records inbox. | — |
| Marshfield Public Schools | Sep 20, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Medway Public Schools | Sep 19, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Natick Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Newburyport Public Schools | Sep 22, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Northampton Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Northborough-Southborough Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Pembroke Public Schools | Sep 20, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | An automatic out-of-office message was received; no substantive response yet. | — |
| Plymouth Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Quincy Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Shrewsbury Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| South Hadley Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Springfield Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Acknowledged | Receipt confirmed by the City of Springfield’s public records portal (request #26-5338). | — |
| Sudbury Public Schools | Sep 22, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Sutton Public Schools | Sep 19, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Wachusett Regional School District | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Waltham Public Schools | Sep 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Awaiting | — | — |
| Watertown Public Schools | Sep 21, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 | Awaiting | The initial delivery to the district’s records contact bounced; the request was forwarded to the town’s public records inbox. | — |
| Whitman-Hanson Regional School District | Sep 20, 2026 | Oct 2, 2026 | Acknowledged | Acknowledgment received from the Records Access Officer’s office. | — |
No districts match that filter.
Don’t see your district? Ask us to add it.
Just send the district name and town/city. No student information is needed.
Use the request yourself
Want to send the request yourself? Use our complete copy-and-paste template. You can adapt the district name, Records Access Officer, and signature and submit it directly to your school district.
How to use it
- Replace the bracketed district and RAO placeholders.
- Verify the district’s current Records Access Officer or official submission address.
- Replace the signature with your own name/organization.
- Keep a copy of the sent request and acknowledgment.
- Do not add student personally identifiable information merely to use this template.
Open the full request template
Hi, Here is the reusable template for the Massachusetts school-district public records request. Replace the bracketed placeholders before sending. Subject: [DISTRICT NAME] — Massachusetts Public Records Request — Student Settlement Agreements, MOUs, MOAs & Resolution Agreements (Sept. 18, 2021–Present) Dear [RAO NAME / Records Access Officer]: Pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law, G.L. c. 66, § 10, and 950 C.M.R. 32.00, I request electronic copies of the following records maintained by [DISTRICT NAME]. TIME PERIOD This request covers records entered into, executed, finalized, materially amended, or extended from September 18, 2021 through the date of your response. RECORDS REQUESTED Please provide all final or executed student-related agreements resolving, compromising, settling, memorializing, or otherwise disposing of a dispute, claim, complaint, appeal, due-process matter, grievance, or other contested educational issue involving [DISTRICT NAME], including: - Settlement agreements and settlement-and-release agreements; - Resolution agreements; - Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs); - Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs); - Mediation agreements; - Stipulations, consent agreements, or agreements for judgment/resolution; - Side agreements, side letters, or similar written agreements; - Amendments, addenda, extensions, or attachments that materially alter or form part of such agreements; and - Any other final written agreement, regardless of title, that resolves or memorializes the resolution of a student-related educational dispute. This includes agreements involving SPECIAL EDUCATION matters, including but not limited to IDEA/G.L. c. 71B, BSEA matters, Section 504, ADA-related educational access, evaluations, eligibility, placement, services, accommodations, compensatory education, tuition or reimbursement, transportation, extended-school-year services, or other special-education rights or services. It also includes agreements involving GENERAL EDUCATION students or student matters, including, where applicable, student discipline or exclusion, access to educational programming, bullying/harassment or discrimination complaints, civil-rights complaints, educational services, enrollment, or other student-related disputes resolved through a written agreement. This request is limited to STUDENT/EDUCATION matters. EXPRESS EXCLUSION — NO STAFF OR EMPLOYMENT RECORDS I am not requesting any agreement whose subject is a District employee, former employee, applicant, administrator, teacher, staff member, bargaining unit, or employment relationship. Please exclude collective-bargaining agreements, employee grievances, personnel settlements, employment discrimination matters, separation agreements, staff discipline matters, workers' compensation matters, and other employee/labor agreements. I am likewise not seeking ordinary vendor, procurement, construction, property, or commercial settlements unrelated to student educational matters. EXISTING LISTS OR INDEXES If the District already maintains an existing log, index, spreadsheet, database export, or other existing record identifying responsive student-related agreements during this period, please include that existing record as well, with student PII redacted as necessary. I am not asking the District to create a new index or summary. NO STUDENT PII REQUESTED I am expressly NOT requesting personally identifiable student information. The District may redact student names, parent/guardian names where identifying, addresses, contact information, student identification numbers, dates of birth, and any other direct or indirect identifier that must be removed under FERPA, Massachusetts student-record law, or another applicable law. For special-education settlement agreements in particular, Champa v. Weston Public Schools, 473 Mass. 86 (2015), establishes that the presence of protected student information does not permit categorical withholding of the entire agreement. Personally identifiable information may be redacted, but segregable non-exempt portions are subject to disclosure. The Supervisor of Records subsequently applied Champa in SPR17/661, Alexander v. Wellesley Public Schools (May 25, 2017), rejecting the argument that Champa was limited only to out-of-district settlement agreements and finding that the school had not met its burden to establish that in-district special-education settlement agreements could be withheld in their entirety. DESE has also reiterated publicly that, in Massachusetts, settlement agreements between school districts and parents of students eligible for special education are public records once all personally identifiable information has been removed. Accordingly, please do not withhold an entire responsive agreement merely because it contains some protected information, a confidentiality provision, or student-record material. Please redact only the information that is lawfully exempt and produce all reasonably segregable non-exempt portions. If the District contends that any responsive agreement must be withheld in its entirety, please identify the record or category of records, the specific statutory exemption or privilege relied upon, and the factual basis explaining why redaction or segregation cannot permit disclosure of any portion, as required by G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv). ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION Please provide all records electronically. For agreements maintained as electronic documents or PDFs, please provide searchable electronic copies where available rather than printing and rescanning them. Native electronic format is welcome where practical. Please transmit records by email, shared download link, or another electronic delivery method. No paper copies are requested, and I do not authorize costs associated solely with printing electronically maintained records. ROLLING PRODUCTION If responsive records can be produced in batches, please provide them on a rolling basis rather than delaying production of readily available records until the entire request has been completed. FEES / PUBLIC INTEREST This request is noncommercial and is intended to contribute to public understanding of the District's use of public funds and its resolution of student-related educational disputes. I therefore request waiver or reduction of any permissible fees under G.L. c. 66, § 10(d)(v). If the District anticipates any fee, please provide the written, itemized, good-faith estimate required by G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii), identifying the actual tasks, time, rate, and factual basis for each component. If a reasonable modification would materially reduce cost or burden while preserving the substance of the request, please identify that specific modification pursuant to G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vii). If no responsive records exist for a particular category, please simply state that. Please confirm receipt of this request. Thank you, [YOUR NAME] [ORGANIZATION, IF ANY]
Records library
Records are on the way.
Requests are still in the initial response period. As productions arrive, Parent Data Force will review them for privacy, organize them by district, summarize what they show, and publish appropriate public copies here.
What happens when records arrive
When a district produces records, each production goes through the same process before it appears on this page:
- Received — the production is logged for the district.
- Privacy/relevance review — the production is checked against the request scope and for student personally identifiable information.
- Indexed and summarized — agreements are organized by district and summarized factually.
- Published with source documents — reviewed records are posted here with their sources.
Records are reviewed before public posting to ensure student personally identifiable information is not inadvertently exposed — names, addresses, student IDs, dates of birth, and unique details that could re-identify a child. District redactions are not assumed to be sufficient on their own.
Legal context
The request invokes the Massachusetts Public Records Law, G.L. c. 66, § 10, and its implementing regulation, 950 C.M.R. 32.00. For special-education settlement agreements, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Champa v. Weston Public Schools, 473 Mass. 86 (2015), requires disclosure of properly redacted settlement agreements once personally identifying information is removed. The Supervisor of Records applied Champa in SPR17/661, Alexander v. Wellesley Public Schools (2017), and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has stated publicly that special-education settlement agreements are public records once stripped of all personally identifiable information.
The existence of a settlement does not prove wrongdoing, and a missed expected date on this tracker does not by itself mean a district violated the law. A response can be an acknowledgment, a fee estimate, a lawful extension, a production schedule, or a complete production. This page reports what was requested, what each district said, and what the produced records show.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly are you asking districts for?
Final or executed written agreements that resolve student-related educational disputes, including settlements, resolution agreements, MOUs/MOAs, mediation agreements, stipulations, side agreements, and material amendments or addenda.
Are you asking for student names?
No. The request expressly says Parent Data Force is not requesting personally identifiable student information.
Why track this statewide?
Comparing districts can show how student disputes are being resolved, what remedies appear, how transparent districts are, and whether recurring patterns emerge. Any conclusions should be based on the records actually produced.
Can I request my district?
Yes. Email joey@parentdataforce.com with the district name and municipality. No student information is needed.
Can I use the request myself?
Yes. The full template is provided on the page so families, journalists, researchers, and community members can adapt it.
What does “expected response” mean?
It is the current response milestone tracked for the request. It does not necessarily mean all records will be produced by that date; a response may include an acknowledgment, fee estimate, extension, production schedule, or other legally permitted response.
Will you publish everything you receive?
Records should be reviewed first. The project should not publish student-identifying information or material that should remain private.
What happens if a district does not respond?
The project follows up with the district. If no adequate response follows, the next step is an appeal to the Supervisor of Public Records under G.L. c. 66, § 10A — the route this project has used elsewhere.
How can I report a correction?
Email joey@parentdataforce.com and identify the district and the information you believe needs to be corrected.
Help expand the project. Request a district, share the page, and check back as records are published.
Email joey@parentdataforce.com to request a district or report a correction.
