Public records project
Massachusetts Student Settlement Records Project
Tracking how public school districts resolve student-related educational disputes — district by district.
Parent Data Force is sending the same focused public-records request across Massachusetts to better understand how school districts resolve student-related educational disputes. We are asking for final written settlement and resolution agreements from September 18, 2021 to the present, with student-identifying information redacted as required by law.
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Live district tracker
65 districts have received the request. Use the search box or the status filters to narrow the list — tap a district to open its full card.
Amesbury Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $750Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $750 · 30 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/3972
- Latest note
- Determination issued Oct. 7, 2026 in SPR26/3972 closed the appeal AGAINST the requestor: the Supervisor found the phrase ‘all final or executed student-related agreements resolving, compromising, settling, memorializing, or otherwise disposing of…’ does not reasonably describe the records sought under G.L. c. 66, s.10(a)(i) and Chawla, and invited clarification – after which the School must answer within ten business days. The $750 estimate (30 hrs x $25) stands as the request now reads. Amesbury’s census population is under 20,000, so no two free hours apply. Reconsideration requested the same day on three grounds, including that Dracut read the same words and identified 45 responsive agreements and Springfield read them and identified about 90.
Amherst-Pelham Regional School DistrictResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $100.00 $50.00Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
$100.00$50.00 · 2 hrs- Records
- —
- Docket
- Latest note
- Revised invoice 27-01 received Oct. 7, 2026 reduces the estimate from $100 to $50: the District states a portion of the fees has been waived. 2.0 hours segregation/redaction at $25/hr. Original estimate remains on file. Oct. 14: a limited appeal of the remaining $50 fee was submitted to the Public Records Division and rescinded the same day as a mis-sent draft; the Division’s request for the underlying request and response as PDFs was answered Oct. 15 with a second withdrawal. No docket number was assigned in the matter and no appeal is pending, so the $50 estimate stands unchanged.
Andover Public SchoolsPartial Fee estimate: $79.25Records published
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 22, 2026
- Fee
- $79.25 · 5.17 hrs
- Records
- 14 · Published
- Docket
- SPR26/4258
- Latest note
- Appealed Oct. 6, 2026; the Supervisor docketed it SPR26/4258. The challenge is not the $79.25 arithmetic (5.17 hrs less two free at $25) but that Andover reads Champa as covering only out-of-district placement agreements and so withholds every other final agreement categorically, without the record-or-category-specific justification s.10(b)(iv) requires. Roughly 31 out-of-district agreements identified, 17 further to be redacted. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4258: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Ashland Public SchoolsPartialDistrict’s own copy
- Timeline
- Sep 19 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 14 · District’s own copy
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Receipt confirmed through Ashland’s public records portal (request #26-548). Oct. 9: the District produced twelve records through a Google Drive folder it controls: nine settlement agreements and three Special Ed. Mediation Agreements, with zero memoranda of understanding and zero resolution agreements. After we reviewed the folder the District supplied two further mediation agreements it had referenced but not uploaded, bringing the production to fourteen documents. Oct. 9: the District will complete a further review of general-education matters and produce any additional responsive records by close of business Oct. 13. Oct. 13: the Superintendent confirmed the search covered general-education student disputes and other final written student-related resolutions — MOAs, stipulations, side letters, material amendments and extensions — and that upon further review there are no additional responsive agreements outside special education.
Athol-Royalston Regional School DistrictAwaitingResponse due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Berlin-Boylston Regional School DistrictResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $50Acknowledged Sep 20, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 19 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 20, 2026
- Fee
- $50 · 2 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Latest note
- Sept. 19: receipt confirmed. Sept. 23: itemized $75 fee estimate received — 3 hours at $25/hour (1 search/compile + 2 review/redaction); records promised by Oct. 13 upon payment. Public-interest fee waiver requested Sept. 23. Sept. 24: the district denied the fee waiver in writing. Sept. 28: Parent Data Force offered to formally narrow the request to Jan. 1, 2024–present to resolve the fee informally. Sept. 29: the District accepted the narrowed scope and reduced the fee estimate to $50.
Beverly Public SchoolsAcknowledgedAcknowledged Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Oct 5, 2026
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4190
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- District confirmed Oct. 5 it had never received the Sept. 18 request; processing began. Oct. 13: the Superintendent stated the Sept. 18 request was diverted to his spam folder, that the District’s Records Officer is preparing a response, and that our address is now allowed; Parent Data Force asked the District to whitelist the parentdataforce.com domain across all district mailboxes. Oct. 20: the Supervisor closed SPR26/4190, finding the School had in fact provided a response on Oct. 5 and that the appeal was opened only for the lack of a written response. The substance of that response may still be appealed within ninety days. Oct. 25: District RAO Peter Cushing replied re: whitelisting and fee exemption; no new records produced. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4190: appeal closed: School had in fact responded Oct. 5; opened only for lack of written response; substance may be appealed within 90 days.
Bourne Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Braintree Public SchoolsRecords receivedAcknowledged Sep 19, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 19, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 1
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Braintree produced 103 pages of combined settlement agreements on Oct. 1, 2026. That file is off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026. Our review found BSEA case-file document identifiers printed in the footers of many pages and BSEA case numbers in the body of others. Student and parent names were correctly barred. Republication depends on the district redacting the identifiers it printed and re-issuing the set.
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School DistrictAppeal filed Fee estimate: $27,550Response due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $27,550 · 470 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4157 / SPR26/4166
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Fee estimate Oct. 2, 2026: $27,550 for ~18,900 responsive pages – 157 hours search at $25 ($3,925) plus 313 hours review at $75 ($23,475 as stated, though the letter’s stated total implies 315 hours; components as written sum to $27,400). Time petition filed for 30 business days. Appeals docketed SPR26/4157 and SPR26/4166. Oct. 8: petition determination (SPR26/4166) granted the District’s requested 30-business-day extension and approved a fee limited to $75.00 per hour for attorney review. Oct. 19: the Supervisor of Records issued her determination on our appeal of the $27,550.00 fee estimate (SPR26/4157). She did not reach the reasonableness of the figure; invoking Friedman v. Div. of Admin. Law Appeals on drain-the-ocean requests, she encouraged the parties to agree on scope, search terms, a production timeframe, withholding rules and a fee methodology, and noted any remaining dispute may be appealed within 90 days. The estimate rests on approximately 18,900 documents, 157 hours of search at $25/hour and 313 hours of review at $75/hour.
Brockton Public SchoolsPartial Fee estimate: $312.50Records published
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $312.50 · 12.5 hrs
- Records
- 3 · Published
- Docket
- SPR26/4173
- Latest note
- Brockton produced three records on Oct. 2, 2026. Two remain published. One response letter is off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026 because its e-signature header carries an envelope identifier unique to this settlement. The signed settlement agreement and the covering letter are unaffected and are still listed below. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4173: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Cambridge Public SchoolsAppeal filedAcknowledged Sep 21, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4251 / SPR26/4214
- Latest note
- Appealed the City’s fee petition Oct. 6, 2026. City request no. P262427-092126. The petition seeks $38.46/hr for 20 School Dept hours plus $54.73/hr for 25 Law Dept hours, and cites a search returning 21 GB / about 185,000 items – a universe far larger than final executed student agreements. The City’s own $25/hr fallback is stated as $1,075 in one place and $1,200 in another. Oct. 14: the Supervisor issued her determination on the City’s fee-and-time petition (SPR26/4214). The request was found not to be for a commercial purpose, but the City established that it could not prudently complete the request without a fee above $25 per hour: the City may assess a fee limited to $54.73 per hour — the Assistant Public Records Access Officer’s rate — and is granted a 25-business-day extension to produce. Our appeal of the petition remains docketed as SPR26/4251. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4251: declined to opine at this time; City’s Oct. 5 fee estimate must be revised in light of Oct. 14 determination; updated estimate appealable within 90 days.
Dartmouth Public SchoolsRecords receivedAcknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 7
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Kathleen Genthner, the administrative assistant to the Superintendent who confirmed receipt on Sept. 23 and signed this Oct. 7 response as Records Access Officer, answered the Sept. 21 request with a three-page letter and a 35-page set of redacted agreements. The District identified approximately seven settlement agreements covering out-of-district private placements from June 1, 2022 through Aug. 31, 2026 and produced them with no fee and no petition. Its letter also takes a substantive legal position: it reads Champa v. Weston as reaching only out-of-district placement agreements and asserts every other student settlement agreement stays exempt under Exemption (a) – a reading narrower than SPR17/661. Held pending our own page-level review.
Dover-Sherborn Regional School DistrictRecords receivedResponse due Oct 6, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 92
- Docket
- Latest note
- Produced a 92-page set of settlement agreements on Oct. 6, 2026 with no fee. Withheld from publication pending review: a BSEA case number is left in the clear on page 21, and eight pages (5, 15, 49, 57, 79, 82, 88, 90) could not be read reliably enough to clear. District staff, BSEA staff and office contacts are not treated as student identifying information. Oct. 7: Superintendent Elizabeth McCoy sent a further letter attaching links to the requested documents hosted on the District’s own Google Drive. We have not verified that those files match the 92-page set we reviewed on Oct. 6, so the production remains withheld for the reasons above and nothing has been added to our records library.
Dracut Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $2,950Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $2,950 · 120 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4024
- Latest note
- Sept. 25: written response received (letter dated Sept. 23 from Supt. Steven Stone): 45 agreements identified as responsive; 120 hours claimed for search, segregation and redaction (first 2 hours free) at $25/hour — a $2,950 fee, plus per-page printing charges. Records produced only upon payment. Sept. 25: Parent Data Force appealed to the Supervisor of Records under G.L. c. 66, § 10A; appeal docketed SPR26/4024. Oct. 9: determination (SPR26/4024) ordered the District to provide a compliant response within ten business days, holding that the $2,950 estimate was not sufficiently itemized or supported and requiring the District to break out search, segregation and redaction time, state the page volume, explain any charge for verification, and state the basis on which it intends to redact.
East Bridgewater Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $350Response due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $350 · 8 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4069
- Latest note
- Determination Oct. 5, 2026 (SPR26/4069): 30-business-day extension granted; fee in excess of $25/hour approved but LIMITED TO $75.00/hour for attorney review. Supervisor relied on Champa v. Weston Public Schools, 473 Mass. 86 (2015): settlement agreements fall outside Exemption (a) but must be redacted and then disclosed. District identified ~6 documents, ~3 hours review. Reconsideration requested on the $75/hour rate. Oct. 14: the Supervisor issued her determination on our appeal of the Sept. 28 response (SPR26/4068). She found the School had met its burden to show that the $350 estimate reflects the time required — five hours of search at $25 per hour plus three hours of review at $75 per hour, the higher rate approved in SPR26/4069 — and held that segregation and redaction under the attorney-client privilege counts as work required by law. The appeal was closed. Oct. 14: Parent Data Force filed a request for reconsideration under SPR Bulletin 04-17, limited to the factual support for the $350 estimate and the adequacy of the Sept. 28 initial response, noting that the same office ordered Westwood to supply a page count and a minutes-per-page figure for a comparable request the same day. The Supervisor opened SPR26/4068 for reconsideration the same day, with a decision due 15 business days from receipt. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4069: reconsideration denied: Supervisor declined to reverse the Oct. 5 determination; East Bridgewater’s fee justification not tailored; petitioner may seek judicial review.
Fairhaven Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $1,125.00Acknowledged Sep 21, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- $1,125.00 · 45 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4261
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Fee estimate of $1,125.00 (45 hrs at $25/hr) received Oct. 7, 2026 on a letter dated Oct. 6. Appealed the same day; the lead ground is that the fee is time-barred under G.L. c. 66, s.10(e) – the request went in Sept. 21, the ten business days ran through Oct. 5, and no substantive answer arrived until Oct. 7. A Superintendent auto-reply fired 11 seconds after the appeal was sent. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4261: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Fall River Public SchoolsAppeal filedResponse due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4188
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Oct. 12: Parent Data Force wrote to the Public Records Division following up on this matter and asking for any status update on SPR26/4188. Oct. 20: the Supervisor of Records ordered the School to provide a response within ten business days, a copy to the Division, after noting it remained unclear whether the School had responded despite notice of the appeal. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4188: ordered to respond within 10 business days; appeal remains open (prior order).
Franklin Public SchoolsRecords receivedResponse due Oct 6, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 1
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Production received Oct. 6, 2026 with no fee and no petition: a 58-page scanned set. WITHHELD FROM PUBLICATION – Parent Data Force’s own PII review found student names, parent names and parent signature ink properly redacted throughout, but one student’s BSEA due-process docket number is left fully unredacted in the ‘BSEA #’ field on pages 2 and 3, sitting directly beneath a solid black bar covering that same student’s name, and the BSEA ‘Doc ID’ footer is unredacted and legible on pages 2 through 5.
Freetown-Lakeville Regional School DistrictRecords receivedAcknowledged Sep 22, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 22, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- District confirmed the original Sept. 18 submission and identified Supt. Barbara Starkie as the school records route after the published Town routing address bounced. Oct. 15-16: the district added additional responsive records to the shared Google Drive folder it maintains, including the remainder of the documentation asked for. The records sit in a district-hosted folder and have not been reviewed or hosted by Parent Data Force.
Gloucester Public SchoolsPartialAcknowledged Sep 21, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 12
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Receipt confirmed through Gloucester’s public records portal (request #26-683). Sept. 29: district staff asked follow-up questions through the portal; no substantive response yet. Oct. 2: NextRequest portal notified a 10-business-day extension to complete request #26-683. Oct. 9: the District closed portal request #26-683 and released twelve redacted settlement agreements. The portal’s documents tab initially displayed no results; Parent Data Force raised it with district staff the same morning and the District resolved it minutes later.
Grafton Public SchoolsRecords receivedRecords published
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 1 · Published
- Docket
- Latest note
- Production received Oct. 6, 2026 with no fee and no petition: a 70-page scanned set. WITHHELD FROM PUBLICATION – Parent Data Force’s own PII review found the District’s redaction inconsistent. Student names and BSEA docket numbers are barred on all 18 BSEA-form pages, but the BSEA ‘Doc ID’ case-file identifier is left unredacted and fully legible on pages 5 and 9, two inches below the student name that WAS redacted on the same pages, and partly legible on page 38. The same footer is correctly barred on page 68, so the omission is inconsistent rather than document-wide. Correcting pages 5, 9 and 38 only would be sufficient. Oct. 7: Nicole MacDonald, Special Education Director, following Dr. Cummings’ referral, confirmed she is reviewing the redaction questions we raised and expects to answer by Oct. 13. The rest of the compilation is still withheld from publication. Oct. 13: the District reissued the pages it had updated. The BSEA case-file identifier that was left legible is now barred on pages 5 and 9 and on page 38, and the District confirmed the material withheld at page 14, Paragraph 15(A)-(B) consists solely of identifying information. Parent Data Force re-reviewed the reissued pages and found them clean; those six pages are published here. The District reissued only the corrected pages, not the full 70-page compilation.
Greenfield Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Holbrook Public SchoolsPartialRecords published
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 24, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 4 · Published
- Docket
- Latest note
- Holbrook produced four agreements on Sept. 30, 2026. Two remain published. The two BSEA mediation agreements are off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026: they carry a BSEA case number on the first page and a case-file document identifier printed in the footer of every page, together with a signer’s email address and network addresses in the e-signature audit trail. Holbrook barred student and parent names correctly. Republication depends on the district re-issuing with those printed identifiers removed.
Hopedale Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $250Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $250 · 10 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4171
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4171: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Hopkinton Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $483.25Acknowledged Sep 20, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 19 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 20, 2026
- Fee
- $483.25 · 33 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4176
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Supt. Evan Bishop confirmed receipt; the request was forwarded to the public records officer. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4176: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Hudson Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $850Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $850 · 34 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4174 / SPR26/4489
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Oct. 19: the Supervisor of Records ruled on the School’s petition for an extension of time (SPR26/4489). She noted the request is the subject of an open appeal (SPR26/4174), on which a determination will issue within 10 business days of the appeal’s receipt, and granted the School a 30-business-day extension on the need to search for, collect, segregate and examine records, the scope of redaction required, and the School’s capacity to produce without it. The petition describes a responsive universe of nearly 2,000 documents. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4174: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Lexington Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $575Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $575 · 23 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4256
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Appealed the $575 estimate (12 search + 8 segregation + 5 redaction = 25 hrs, less two free) on Oct. 6, 2026. Docketed by the Supervisor as SPR26/4256. The estimate is built on a broad email search the District says ‘may yield student records, employee/personnel material and other private information’ – materially wider than a request that excludes staff records. No page or agreement count was given. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4256: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Marshfield Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 20 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Medway Public SchoolsRecords receivedResponse due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 19 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Oct. 2: District’s Director of Finance and Operations, as Records Access Officer, responded that a search compiled 14 records totaling 90 pages and will provide redacted records ‘as soon as possible, and no later than’ the date in its letter — up to 25 business days from receipt. No fee estimate. Oct. 26: Oct 26 production (mediations + settlements) fails PII gate (DocuSign envelope IDs, signer IP); records received but not published pending PII redaction.
Methuen Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $137.50Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $137.50 · 5.5 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4132
- Latest note
- Receipt confirmed through the district’s public-records portal (request #PRR-2026-478). Oct. 1: Methuen’s JustFOIA portal marked request PRR-2026-478 “Completed” on Oct. 1, instructing the requester to download responsive records, while the request page showed that no documents had been added; a reply reporting the defect was rejected because the request had already been closed. Methuen’s Sept. 30 written response identifies approximately 45 potentially responsive settlement or related agreements and demands $137.50 — 5.5 hours at $25/hour after the two statutory free hours — before it will “commence gathering and redacting” any responsive records, and states no production timeframe. Parent Data Force appealed to the Supervisor of Records under G.L. c. 66, § 10 and 950 C.M.R. 32.08 on Oct. 1 and filed a supplemental appeal the same day, disputing the chargeable segregation and redaction time, the unsupported ten-minutes-per-agreement assumption, the missing production timeframe, and the treatment of the public-interest waiver request, and asking that the request be kept open. Docket pending. Oct. 16: the Supervisor of Records determined our appeal of the $137.50 estimate (SPR26/4132). She found the 7.5 hours insufficiently explained – the School states approximately 45 agreements at approximately 10 minutes each without disclosing pages per agreement or minutes per page – and held that, absent a petition under G.L. c. 66, s. 10(d)(iv), the School may not charge for time spent redacting under Exemption (c). The School was ordered to revise the estimate or further explain it within 10 business days.
Milton Public SchoolsRecords receivedAcknowledged Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Oct 7, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Answered for the first time Oct. 7, 2026. RAO Charlene M. Roche reported that District employees searched and compiled 259 pages of responsive documents, that all of them must be reviewed and redacted for student identifiers under Exemption (a), and that the redacted documents will be provided ‘at no charge’. The District invoked G.L. c. 66, s.10(b)(vi) to take up to 25 business days from its Sept. 23 receipt – to Oct. 29, 2026 – and offered to answer earlier if it can. Oct. 26: Oct 22 production (5 PDFs from Charlene Roche) fails PII gate (Doc ID labels, signer IP, BSEA case-file id); records received but not published pending PII redaction.
Natick Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $275Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $275 · 5 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4044 / SPR26/4063 / SPR26/4324
- Latest note
- Determination Oct. 5, 2026 (SPR26/4044): 30-business-day extension granted; fee in excess of $25/hour approved but LIMITED TO $75.00/hour for attorney review. Reconsideration requested on the $75/hour rate. Oct. 7: the Supervisor opened SPR26/4044 for reconsideration of the Oct. 5 determination on our narrow request, which challenges only the $75-per-hour attorney-review rate and not the 30-business-day extension; a decision is due 15 business days from the Oct. 5 request. Oct. 9: the message to the District’s records contact bounced as undeliverable; the receiving mailbox is inactive. Oct. 9: determination (SPR26/4063) found it uncertain whether the Sept. 28 filing was intended as an appeal of the District’s response and invited clarification within 90 days; we filed that clarification the same day under G.L. c. 66, Section 10A(a) and 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Oct. 13: the Public Records Division acknowledged that clarification as a separate appeal docketed SPR26/4324 and assigned it to Staff Attorney Clare Eberman; the objections to the District’s Sept. 28 response now proceed under their own case number, while the SPR26/4044 reconsideration limited to the $75-per-hour attorney-review rate remains pending. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4324: appeal closed: Supervisor will now consider this administrative appeal closed; judicial remedies remain available.
New Bedford Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- An automatic out-of-office reply was received; no acknowledgment of the records request yet.
Newburyport Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $68.70Response due Oct 6, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $68.70 · 2.75 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4257
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Fee estimate Oct. 6, 2026: $68.70 for 2.75 hours to redact 11 agreements at $25/hour. The District’s own letter states the arithmetic as ‘2.75 x 25 = 68.70’, which does not compute – 2.75 x 25 is $68.75. The District also reads Champa v. Weston Public Schools narrowly, claiming categorical exemption for agreements outside out-of-district placements; that position was rejected in SPR17/661. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4257: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
North Attleborough Public SchoolsResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $100 Fee waived Oct 1, 2026Acknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
- $100 · 6 hrsWaived Oct 1, 2026
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Latest note
- Supt. John Antonucci confirmed receipt in writing Sept. 23, after the request was re-routed to him when the published school-RAO mailbox proved outdated. Sept. 29: fee estimate received — District anticipates at least 10 hours but capped the estimate at 6 hours (first 2 hours free, 4 chargeable at $25/hour, $100 total), offered as a cooperative accommodation; includes appeal-rights notice. Sept. 29: Parent Data Force asked the District to waive the remaining $100 entirely in recognition of the project’s public-interest purpose; awaiting the district’s reply. Oct. 1: North Attleborough waived the entire $100 fee in writing — Supt. John Antonucci, 1:20 p.m. — calling it a one-time exception and not a guarantee for future requests, and saying the District’s response would come “next week”; Parent Data Force acknowledged the waiver the same afternoon. First district in the project to assess a fee and then waive it in full.
Northampton Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $950.00Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $950.00 · 40 hrs
- Records
- 1
- Docket
- SPR26/4259
- Latest note
- Prices the request at $950 (40 hrs less two free at $25) and produced one readily available agreement with its Oct. 5 response while stating it has identified further records it has not yet produced. Appealed Oct. 6, 2026: the District’s clarifying question is narrower than the request, since a final written agreement resolving a contested educational issue is responsive whether or not the dispute reached formal litigation, and the $950 rests on one undifferentiated 40-hour block with no agreement or page count. The single produced record is held back from publication pending our own page-level review. Oct. 7: the Supervisor acknowledged our appeal as SPR26/4259, and the District wrote that the estimate ‘stems from not being able to itemize the cost’, stating it has 50 Special Education settlement agreements of varying sizes that would need to be redacted and attaching a Student Services document identifying the fiscal year and the amount of each settlement. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4259: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Northborough-Southborough Public SchoolsRecords receivedDistrict’s own copy
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 24 · District’s own copy
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Production retrieved Oct. 1, 2026 and held for review: a 24-page scanned compilation of four student settlement agreements. WITHHELD FROM PUBLICATION – our own page-level review found the district’s redaction incomplete. Two students’ Bureau of Special Education Appeals due-process case numbers are printed unredacted, on pages 14, 16 and 23, and handwritten parent or guardian signature ink protrudes above and below the redaction bars on pages 6, 13 and 24. We do not publish a record we have withheld, and we do not restate in words the case numbers we are withholding the pages to protect. Status stays records received, review pending. The district’s own file is at its Drive folder linked from this row.
Peabody Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $300 (14 hrs at $25/hr) $350.00Acknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
$300 (14 hrs at $25/hr)$350.00 · 14 hrs- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4527
- Latest note
- Sept. 25: response letter from RAO Lily Bettencourt with invoice: 14 hours claimed for search, segregation, redaction and production at $25/hr (first 2 hours free) — $300 total; work begins upon receipt of payment. Oct. 20: the District denied the public-interest fee waiver and raised the estimate to $350.00 — approximately 47 responsive agreements, 16 gross hours less two statutory free hours at $25/hr — an unexplained increase of $50 and two hours over Sept. 25, with no page count, pages-per-agreement figure or sampling method behind the 20.42-minute average. Parent Data Force appealed both estimates and the waiver denial the same morning. Oct. 21: District (Josh Vadala) replied on the appeal; no determination yet.
Pembroke Public SchoolsRecords receivedResponse due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 20 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 1
- Docket
- Documents
- Response
- Latest note
- Pembroke produced its full set of settlement agreements on Sept. 29, 2026, free and unpetitioned, and was one of the fastest and most cooperative districts in this project. The published file is off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026 because an e-signature audit trail on several pages carries an envelope identifier tied to this specific settlement. Pembroke’s redaction of student and parent identifying information was correct. Republication depends on the district re-issuing without the audit-trail stamp.
Pentucket Regional School DistrictResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $150Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $150 · 6 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Sept. 25: itemized fee estimate from Alyson Tedeschi: 2.0 hours search/compilation ($50) plus 4.0 hours review/redaction ($100) at $25/hr — $150 total, with production anticipated within 10 business days of payment.
Plymouth Public SchoolsRecords receivedResponse due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Production received Sept. 28, 2026 from HR Coordinator Kristen DiGravio: the special-education portion of the Sept. 21 settlement-agreements request, 116 pages via Google Drive file 1rE97eKDnRYbT1Ku1JH2hJEI6rSt29bIf. PARTIAL: the promised general-education follow-up has never arrived through Oct. 7. WITHHELD FROM PUBLICATION – Parent Data Force’s own PII review found the most exposed material of any production in this project: a parent family name and two student first names on pages 59-68 alongside the parents’ personal Gmail addresses; a Dropbox Sign audit trail on page 31 naming the parent signer with personal Yahoo addresses and home IP addresses; a parent-side advocate on page 30; an unredacted student name and a parent home address on page 103 and another on page 101; and blank or partial DESE IEP and Placement Consent Forms with Student Name, DOB and SASID fields on pages 5-7. Do not publish without a fresh redaction from the District.
Public Schools of BrooklineRouting / portalResponse due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Town Clerk directed submission through Brookline’s online platform; portal receipt confirmation pending.
Quincy Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $450Response due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $450 · 10 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4087
- Latest note
- Determination issued Oct. 6, 2026 in SPR26/4087 granted Quincy a 30-business-day extension AND allowed $75/hr for attorney review, while capping every other task at $25/hr and finding the request was not for a commercial purpose. About 375 pages identified; the District’s own math is 6 search hrs ($150) plus 4 attorney hrs at $75 ($300) = $450. Reconsideration was requested Oct. 6 limited strictly to the $75 hourly rate – the extension is not challenged – on the ground that routine removal of student PII from a final executed agreement is not legal work.
Saugus Public SchoolsRecords receivedAcknowledged Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Oct 7, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 6
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Replied for the first time Oct. 7, 2026. RAO Jon P. Krichman, Compliance Officer / Title IX Coordinator, identified six documents from September 18, 2021 to present responsive to the Sept. 23 request and enclosed them as a 14-page redacted PDF, stating the documents are ‘being provided electronically at no charge’. Held pending our own page-level review; nothing has been published to the records library.
Sharon Public SchoolsAcknowledgedAcknowledged Sep 25, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 25, 2026
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Receipt acknowledged by RAO Dr. Joel Jocelyn on Sept. 25 (request received Sept. 23); response promised within 10 business days.
Shrewsbury Public SchoolsRecords received Fee estimate: $0Response due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $0 · 1.5 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4207
- Latest note
- Fee estimate: $0 — the District located about 14 responsive documents and estimated 1.5 hours, inside the two free municipal hours. Oct. 13: the Supervisor granted the School’s petition for five additional business days to produce (docketed SPR26/4207), in a determination that restates that filing a petition does not extend the ten-business-day initial-response duty. Oct. 19: the district’s Records Access Officer responded to the SPR26/4207 petition determination, producing a 30-page packet of responsive settlement agreements to the requestor and the Public Records Division. The packet is held unpublished: pages 28-30 carry BSEA case-file document identifiers and it does not clear this project’s PII review. Oct. 26: prior packet failed PII gate; new Oct 19 packet (Shrewsbury settlements.pdf) also fails PII gate (Doc ID labels); records received but not published pending PII redaction.
Silver Lake Regional School DistrictAppeal filed Fee estimate: $650.00Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $650.00 · 26 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4253
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Fee estimate Oct. 6, 2026: $650 for 26 hours at the $25.00 statutory cap. The District disclosed the assigned employee’s actual rate is $31.33/hour and billed the cap. No fee petition or extension filed; payment demanded in advance before any response. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4253: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Somerset Public SchoolsAppeal filedAcknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4099
- Latest note
- RAO Robin Vaccaro sent a combined fee estimate + fee/time petition (letter dated Sept. 23); contested same day (SPR26/4099). Oct. 1: Somerset asked whether PRS complaint records are within the scope of the request; the requester clarified that signed settlement agreements attached to or associated with a PRS process are in scope, but standalone PRS documents are not. Somerset said it would confirm with the Director of Special Education. The fee-and-time petition in SPR26/4099 remains pending. Oct. 7: a petition determination issued in SPR26/4099 granting Somerset a 30-business-day extension and permission to charge up to $75.00 per hour for attorney review, with the request found not to be for a commercial purpose.
South Hadley Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 5, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Springfield Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $700Acknowledged Sep 21, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- $700 · 28 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4255
- Latest note
- Appealed the City’s $700 good-faith estimate on Oct. 6, 2026 (City request no. 26-5338, docketed SPR26/4255). About 90 agreements may be responsive; 30 hrs at $25/hr less two free, plus 5 further hrs of Public Records Division review that is not itemised. The appeal also asks that the ten-day deemed-withdrawal clock be tolled while the appeal is live. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4255: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Sudbury Public SchoolsResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $25.00Response due Oct 6, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 22 → Oct 6, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $25.00 · 1 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Sudbury confirmed it holds responsive records and estimated one hour of redaction at $25/hr, for $25. The public-interest fee waiver was declined in writing: ‘we are in a similarly limited position in terms of our resources… unable to grant a fee waiver.’ Payment is by mail to the district. Request submitted Sept. 22, 2026.
Sutton Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 19 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Swansea Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $500 (20 hrs at $25/hr) $325Acknowledged Sep 24, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 24, 2026
- Fee
$500 (20 hrs at $25/hr)$325 · 13 hrs- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4382
- Latest note
- Records Access Officer Scott Holcomb’s Oct. 6 response prices about nine hours of student-information review and redaction. Parent Data Force asked the District to re-scope the estimate against a narrower window beginning at its own 2023 Boston Globe cutoff rather than appeal immediately, and sent two redacted agreements from another district as worked examples of what a usable redaction looks like. Oct. 13: after the period was narrowed, the District cut its good-faith estimate from $500 to $325 — 13 hours at $25/hour itemized across six tasks, $0 electronic reproduction — while leaving the new starting cutoff date to be confirmed. Parent Data Force appealed both estimates the same evening, putting the Supervisor’s Dracut and Weymouth determinations in front of her office as exhibits and objecting that no record or page count yet supports any of the thirteen hours. Oct. 14: the Supervisor acknowledged the appeal as SPR26/4382 and assigned it to Staff Attorney Barbara Durgin. Oct. 15: Superintendent Holcomb filed a supplemental explanation with the Public Records Division and copied Parent Data Force — the revised $325 stands for 13 anticipated hours rather than completed work, the figure was reached by re-allocating the original task lines to the narrower period and was not based on a completed inventory or a page-by-page review, the prior Boston Globe production cutoff remains to be confirmed, the District does not assert that whole agreements are exempt merely because they concern students, the separate task descriptions were not intended to charge twice for the same activity, and any final assessment would be limited to actual, reasonable, legally permissible costs. The District is maintaining its request for recovery of permissible costs rather than granting a full waiver. Oct. 15: the Supervisor issued her determination in SPR26/4382 and closed the appeal because the District had provided a further response, noting that the substance of that Oct. 15 response may be appealed within 90 days.
Tantasqua Regional School DistrictRecords receivedAcknowledged Sep 25, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 25, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 10
- Docket
- Latest note
- Tantasqua was the first district in this project to produce records and to charge nothing for them: 45 pages, delivered Sept. 25, 2026. The published file is off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026 because our review found BSEA case-file document identifiers in the footer of the last pages and BSEA case numbers in the body of several others. Names, dates of birth and addresses were correctly barred. This change of status reflects our review error, not any change in Tantasqua’s conduct, which has been exemplary throughout.
Wachusett Regional School DistrictRecords receivedAcknowledged Sep 29, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 29, 2026
- Fee
- Records
- 91
- Docket
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Produced 91 pages of settlement agreements on Oct. 6, 2026 with no fee. Withheld from publication pending a redaction correction: the BSEA Doc ID footer (a long opaque identifier) is left legible on pages 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the production, in the same footer position across those pages. The District correctly barred student and parent names and redacted private school names. A one-line fix – barring the footer identifier – would let the set publish.
Wakefield Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $3,000.00Acknowledged Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Oct 7, 2026
- Fee
- $3,000.00 · 40 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4271 / SPR26/4277
- Latest note
- The District answered on Oct. 7, 2026 for the first time: RAO Deidre Sandonato’s letter on the request received Sept. 23, 2026 estimates approximately 50-100 responsive documents, 40 hours of review at one minute per page, and $75 per hour for attorney review = $3,000.00, while stating that counsel’s actual rate is about $270 per hour and that search time is billed at $25. The District filed a contemporaneous fee and time petition with the Supervisor for both the higher rate and an additional 30 business days. We appealed the response and opposed the petition the same day; no docket number has been assigned. Our opposition notes that the $3,000 figure never accounts for the two free hours that apply to a municipality over 20,000 (38 billable hours at $75 is $2,850), discloses no page count behind the 40 hours, and recites a duty to review ‘each page of the invoices sought in the request’ – invoices we never asked for. Oct. 14: the Supervisor issued her determination on the District’s fee-and-time petition (SPR26/4271): she found good cause for a 30-business-day extension to produce, and the School may assess a fee limited to $75.00 per hour for attorney review. The determination rules on the rate and the extension, not on the $3,000 figure itself. Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4277: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Waltham Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $132.50Response due Oct 2, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 18 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $132.50 · 7.3 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4170
- Documents
- —
- Latest note
- Oct. 26 determination SPR26/4170: ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Watertown Public SchoolsPartialRecords published
- Timeline
- Sep 21 → Oct 5, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- Records
- 59 · Published
- Docket
- Documents
- Response · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Records · Article
- Latest note
- Watertown produced 59 numbered settlement agreements on Sept. 30, 2026 with no fee and no invoice, the largest single production in this project. We publish 25 of them. Thirty-three of the 58 copies we had put online are off the site as of Oct. 7, 2026: on 32 of those, our own page-by-page review found the district’s redaction left a Bureau of Special Education Appeals case-file document identifier printed in the page footer, or a student’s first name in the body text. One further copy could not be read reliably enough to clear, so it comes down rather than stay up unverified. Watertown correctly barred parent names, most student names, dates of birth and home addresses, and what we missed the first time is printed text, not handwriting. Republication depends on the district correcting its own redaction and re-issuing – we do not alter a district’s records for it. A fifty-fifth agreement has never been published here, because two typed parent names sit beneath the signature lines.
Webster Public SchoolsAwaitingResponse due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- —
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Documents
- —
Westfield Public SchoolsRecords received Fee estimate: $200 $87.50Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
$200$87.50 · 3.5 hrs- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4111 / SPR26/4117
- Latest note
- Response to appeal SPR26/4117 (Oct. 5, 2026): revised fee REDUCED from $200 to $87.50. District located 10 documents (84 pages) since July 1, 2025 and estimates 16 more (~128 pages) for 2021-mid-2025 – 26 documents, 212 pages total. 2 hours collection plus 3.5 hours review; first 2 hours free, so 3.5 chargeable hours at $25. Oct. 7: two determinations issued the same day. SPR26/4111 granted the District a 30-business-day extension and permission to charge up to $75.00 per hour for attorney review, holding every other task to $25 per hour and finding the request not commercial; SPR26/4117 closed our appeal as moot because the District answered again on Oct. 5 and Oct. 7 after the appeal opened, with leave to appeal the newer responses within 90 days. In the Oct. 7 update the RAO reported ‘far fewer settlement agreements from 2021-2025 than anticipated based on the quantity we found from 7/25 to the current time, which brought the total down to 68 pages’, that redaction ‘will take approximately an hour’, and that because ‘the first 2 hours are free, the total billable time likely falls below the threshold’ – i.e. the $87.50 demand is expected to fall away. Nothing had been delivered to us at that point. Oct. 16: the City of Westfield produced 64 pages of settlement agreements, the first records on this request. The district was asked to reconcile that against the Oct. 7 reference to about 68 pages, and privately to re-review pages 11, 41, 45, 57 and 60 for further student- and family-identifying information before any publication. Oct. 19: the district sent a further-redacted copy. Neither copy clears this project’s PII review – the Oct. 19 file still carries e-signature audit trails and case-file document identifiers – so the records are held unpublished. Oct. 26: new re-redacted packet Oct 19 (Settlement Agreements as per PRR 110.7.26_Redacted.pdf) fails PII gate (Doc ID + signer IP); records received but not published pending PII redaction.
Westwood Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $520 (13 hrs at $40/hr) $300Acknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
$520 (13 hrs at $40/hr)$300 · 12 hrs- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4078
- Latest note
- Receipt confirmed in the Town’s public-records system (request #2026-0280); system milestone Oct. 7, 2026. Sept. 29: fee estimate received from School Department reviewer Leeann Plouffe — 13 hours at $40/hour, $520 total, request placed on hold pending payment — despite the District’s own Sept. 23 acknowledgment capping the rate at $25/hour. Parent Data Force appealed to the Supervisor of Records the same day. Oct. 1: Westwood revised its fee estimate down from $520 (13 hours at $40/hour) to $300 (12 hours at $25/hour) — the rate it had already conceded in its Sept. 23 acknowledgment — cancelled the prior estimate, and filed the revision with the Supervisor in SPR26/4078; the request remains on hold pending payment and the appeal remains pending. Parent Data Force replied the same day that the revised estimate still appears materially overstated and insufficiently supported. Oct. 14: the Supervisor of Records issued her determination in SPR26/4078. The $25 hourly rate and the charge for the first two hours held — Westwood is a municipality small enough to bill them — but the School was ordered to revise its $300 estimate or further explain how twelve hours of employee time is consistent with the law, including why ten hours of redaction were assumed without stating how many pages of responsive records exist or how many minutes per page review takes, and what the one hour of scanning and electronic preparation actually covers. The School must respond consistently with the order within ten business days and file a copy with the Supervisor’s office.
Weymouth Public SchoolsAppeal filed Fee estimate: $350Response due Oct 7, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- —
- Fee
- $350 · 14 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4062
- Latest note
- The Town Clerk’s Office confirmed the request was uploaded to its records request portal and is under review; future requests are directed through the Town’s NextRequest system. Sept. 28: School Department response through the portal (request #26-4756): about 30 records potentially responsive; fee estimate $350 (12 redaction/review hours + 1 additional search hour + 1 final-preparation hour); request would be deemed withdrawn without payment within 20 business days. Parent Data Force appealed the same day; appeal docketed SPR26/4062. Oct. 13: the Supervisor of Records issued determination SPR26/4062, ordering the School to revise its $350 fee estimate or explain how it complies, and holding that the School may not assess a fee for the employee time spent redacting records under Exemption (c) without an approved petition. A response is due within ten business days.
Whitman-Hanson Regional School DistrictAppeal filed Fee estimate: $925Acknowledged Sep 21, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 20 → Oct 2, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 21, 2026
- Fee
- $925 · 15 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- SPR26/4165 / SPR26/4161
- Documents
- Article
- Latest note
- Fee estimate and time petition Oct. 2, 2026: $925 – 11 hours review at the requested $75 ($825) plus 4 hours search at $25 ($100). District seeks approval to charge above $25/hour for attorney review. Docketed SPR26/4161 and SPR26/4165. Oct. 9: petition determination (SPR26/4161) granted the District’s requested 30-business-day extension and approved a fee limited to $75.00 per hour for attorney review of segregation and redaction. Oct. 19: the Supervisor of Records issued her determination on our appeal of the fee estimate (SPR26/4165). She found the $925.00 estimate unexplained: the School reported both ‘approximately 27’ and ‘approximately 14’ responsive documents, and both four hours and ‘in excess of six (4) hours’ of search. The School was ordered to revise the estimate or provide further explanation within 10 business days, and to clarify whether it is charging for the first two free municipal hours.
Wilmington Public SchoolsResponse / fee estimate Fee estimate: $165.00Acknowledged Sep 23, 2026
- Timeline
- Sep 23 → Oct 7, 2026
- Acknowledged
- Sep 23, 2026
- Fee
- $165.00 · 6.6 hrs
- Records
- —
- Docket
- Latest note
- RAO Lauren Celi of the District’s records office answered the Sept. 23 request on Oct. 7 in a five-page letter: about 52 potentially responsive agreements of one to eight pages each, five minutes of segregation plus five minutes of review/redaction per agreement, 8.6 hours total, the first two hours excluded, and the remaining 6.6 hours at $25 per hour = $165.00. The letter also refuses the fee waiver on the ground that the request’s public-interest statement is ‘generalized’ without more, and states the District holds no responsive log, index, or database export. Payment is demanded before any production begins.
No districts match that filter.
Requested next
This list is ranked by reader votes — the more ▲ a district has, the higher it sits, and the top of the list is the next standard request when staff time opens up. New districts start at the bottom and climb as readers vote. Check the Live District Tracker above and this list before requesting a district — if a district is already tracked or queued, there’s no need to request it again.
Not near the top yet? Open a district’s card and tap ▲ to vote it up — every vote moves it up the list.
No queued districts match that search.
1Billerica Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 4×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 15, 2026
- Times requested
- 4
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
2Newton Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
3Stoughton Public Schoolsfirst Sep 25, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
4Mendon-Upton Regional School Districtfirst Sep 30, 2026 · requested 2×
- First requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 10, 2026
- Times requested
- 2
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
5Belmont Public Schoolsfirst Sep 30, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
6Stoneham Public Schoolsfirst Sep 30, 2026 · requested 2×
- First requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Times requested
- 2
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
7Blackstone-Millville Regional School Districtfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
8Boston Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
9Wellesley Public Schoolsfirst Oct 2, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
10Tewksbury Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
11Douglas Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
12Haverhill Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
13Quabbin Regional School Districtfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
14Tyngsborough Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
15Everett Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
16Lowell Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
17Easton Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
18Bristol-Plymouth Regional Technical School Districtfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
19Chelmsford Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
20Lawrence Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
21Seekonk Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
22Sandwich Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
23Barnstable Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
24Gardner Public Schoolsfirst Sep 25, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
25West Bridgewater Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
26Foxborough Regional Charter Schoolfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
27Rockland Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
28Carver Public Schoolsfirst Sep 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
29Auburn Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
30North Andover Public Schoolsfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader before the queue form existed.
- Vote
31Dennis-Yarmouth Regional School Districtfirst Sep 24, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 24, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
32Acushnet Public Schoolsfirst Sep 25, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
33Masconomet Regional School Districtfirst Sep 25, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 25, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
34Northbridge public schoolsfirst Sep 26, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
35Medford Public Schoolsfirst Sep 26, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
36Chelsea Public Schoolsfirst Sep 30, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 30, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
37Georgetown Public Schoolsfirst Oct 1, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 1, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 1, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
38Wayland Public Schoolsfirst Oct 2, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
39Marlborough Public Schoolsfirst Oct 9, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 9, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 9, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
40Framingham public schoolsfirst Oct 12, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 12, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 12, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
41Dighton-Rehobothfirst Oct 13, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 13, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 13, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
42Norfolk County Agricultural High Schoolfirst Sep 26, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 26, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
43Malcolm White Elementary Schoolfirst Sep 27, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 27, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 27, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
44Chicopee Public Schoolsfirst Sep 28, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 28, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 28, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
45Mansfield Public Schools/ Roland Green Preschoolfirst Sep 28, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Sep 28, 2026
- Last requested
- Sep 28, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
46King Philip Regional School Districtfirst Oct 2, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
47Westfordfirst Oct 2, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 2, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
48wareham public schoolfirst Oct 10, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 10, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 10, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
49Taft Elementary schoolfirst Oct 12, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 12, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 12, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- Suggested by a reader via email.
- Vote
50West Springfield Public Schoolsfirst Oct 14, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 14, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 14, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
51Lynnfield Public Schools (Summer Street Elementary)first Oct 23, 2026 · requested 1×
- First requested
- Oct 23, 2026
- Last requested
- Oct 23, 2026
- Times requested
- 1
- Note
- —
- Vote
Every donation buys more records requests.
Queue a district
Don’t see your district? Ask us to add it.
Just send the district name and town/city. No student information is needed.
Use the request yourself
Want to send the request yourself? Use our complete copy-and-paste template. You can adapt the district name, Records Access Officer, and signature and submit it directly to your school district.
How to use it
- Replace the bracketed district and RAO placeholders.
- Verify the district’s current Records Access Officer or official submission address.
- Replace the signature with your own name/organization.
- Keep a copy of the sent request and acknowledgment.
- Do not add student personally identifiable information merely to use this template.
Open the full request template
Hi, Here is the reusable template for the Massachusetts school-district public records request. Replace the bracketed placeholders before sending. Subject: [DISTRICT NAME] — Massachusetts Public Records Request — Student Settlement Agreements, MOUs, MOAs & Resolution Agreements (Sept. 18, 2021–Present) Dear [RAO NAME / Records Access Officer]: Pursuant to the Massachusetts Public Records Law, G.L. c. 66, § 10, and 950 C.M.R. 32.00, I request electronic copies of the following records maintained by [DISTRICT NAME]. TIME PERIOD This request covers records entered into, executed, finalized, materially amended, or extended from September 18, 2021 through the date of your response. RECORDS REQUESTED Please provide all final or executed student-related agreements resolving, compromising, settling, memorializing, or otherwise disposing of a dispute, claim, complaint, appeal, due-process matter, grievance, or other contested educational issue involving [DISTRICT NAME], including: - Settlement agreements and settlement-and-release agreements; - Resolution agreements; - Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs); - Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs); - Mediation agreements; - Stipulations, consent agreements, or agreements for judgment/resolution; - Side agreements, side letters, or similar written agreements; - Amendments, addenda, extensions, or attachments that materially alter or form part of such agreements; and - Any other final written agreement, regardless of title, that resolves or memorializes the resolution of a student-related educational dispute. This includes agreements involving SPECIAL EDUCATION matters, including but not limited to IDEA/G.L. c. 71B, BSEA matters, Section 504, ADA-related educational access, evaluations, eligibility, placement, services, accommodations, compensatory education, tuition or reimbursement, transportation, extended-school-year services, or other special-education rights or services. It also includes agreements involving GENERAL EDUCATION students or student matters, including, where applicable, student discipline or exclusion, access to educational programming, bullying/harassment or discrimination complaints, civil-rights complaints, educational services, enrollment, or other student-related disputes resolved through a written agreement. This request is limited to STUDENT/EDUCATION matters. EXPRESS EXCLUSION — NO STAFF OR EMPLOYMENT RECORDS I am not requesting any agreement whose subject is a District employee, former employee, applicant, administrator, teacher, staff member, bargaining unit, or employment relationship. Please exclude collective-bargaining agreements, employee grievances, personnel settlements, employment discrimination matters, separation agreements, staff discipline matters, workers' compensation matters, and other employee/labor agreements. I am likewise not seeking ordinary vendor, procurement, construction, property, or commercial settlements unrelated to student educational matters. EXISTING LISTS OR INDEXES If the District already maintains an existing log, index, spreadsheet, database export, or other existing record identifying responsive student-related agreements during this period, please include that existing record as well, with student PII redacted as necessary. I am not asking the District to create a new index or summary. NO STUDENT PII REQUESTED I am expressly NOT requesting personally identifiable student information. The District may redact student names, parent/guardian names where identifying, addresses, contact information, student identification numbers, dates of birth, and any other direct or indirect identifier that must be removed under FERPA, Massachusetts student-record law, or another applicable law. For special-education settlement agreements in particular, Champa v. Weston Public Schools, 473 Mass. 86 (2015), establishes that the presence of protected student information does not permit categorical withholding of the entire agreement. Personally identifiable information may be redacted, but segregable non-exempt portions are subject to disclosure. The Supervisor of Records subsequently applied Champa in SPR17/661, Alexander v. Wellesley Public Schools (May 25, 2017), rejecting the argument that Champa was limited only to out-of-district settlement agreements and finding that the school had not met its burden to establish that in-district special-education settlement agreements could be withheld in their entirety. DESE has also reiterated publicly that, in Massachusetts, settlement agreements between school districts and parents of students eligible for special education are public records once all personally identifiable information has been removed. Accordingly, please do not withhold an entire responsive agreement merely because it contains some protected information, a confidentiality provision, or student-record material. Please redact only the information that is lawfully exempt and produce all reasonably segregable non-exempt portions. If the District contends that any responsive agreement must be withheld in its entirety, please identify the record or category of records, the specific statutory exemption or privilege relied upon, and the factual basis explaining why redaction or segregation cannot permit disclosure of any portion, as required by G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv). ELECTRONIC PRODUCTION Please provide all records electronically. For agreements maintained as electronic documents or PDFs, please provide searchable electronic copies where available rather than printing and rescanning them. Native electronic format is welcome where practical. Please transmit records by email, shared download link, or another electronic delivery method. No paper copies are requested, and I do not authorize costs associated solely with printing electronically maintained records. ROLLING PRODUCTION If responsive records can be produced in batches, please provide them on a rolling basis rather than delaying production of readily available records until the entire request has been completed. FEES / PUBLIC INTEREST This request is noncommercial and is intended to contribute to public understanding of the District's use of public funds and its resolution of student-related educational disputes. I therefore request waiver or reduction of any permissible fees under G.L. c. 66, § 10(d)(v). If the District anticipates any fee, please provide the written, itemized, good-faith estimate required by G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii), identifying the actual tasks, time, rate, and factual basis for each component. If a reasonable modification would materially reduce cost or burden while preserving the substance of the request, please identify that specific modification pursuant to G.L. c. 66, § 10(b)(vii). If no responsive records exist for a particular category, please simply state that. Please confirm receipt of this request. Thank you, [YOUR NAME] [ORGANIZATION, IF ANY]
What we are requesting
Each district receives a request for final or executed written agreements that resolve or memorialize student-related educational disputes, regardless of title:
- Settlement agreements and settlement-and-release agreements
- Resolution agreements
- Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs)
- Mediation agreements
- Stipulations, consent agreements, or agreements for judgment/resolution
- Side agreements and side letters
- Amendments, addenda, extensions, or material attachments to such agreements
- Any other final written agreement resolving a student-related educational dispute
We are not requesting personally identifiable student information. The request expressly allows districts to redact student names, parent/guardian names where identifying, addresses, student numbers, dates of birth, and other personally identifiable information protected by law.
Why this project exists
Parent Data Force is sending substantially the same Massachusetts Public Records Law request to public school districts across the Commonwealth. The request seeks final or executed student-related agreements entered into, finalized, materially amended, or extended from September 18, 2021 through the date of each district’s response. The project currently covers 65 districts.
The request asks for final written agreements that resolve or memorialize student-related educational disputes — settlement agreements, resolution agreements, MOUs and MOAs, mediation agreements, stipulations and consent agreements, side agreements, material amendments and addenda, and other final written agreements. It covers both special-education and general-education disputes, including placement, services, evaluations, eligibility, accommodations, compensatory education, tuition and reimbursement, transportation, extended school year, discipline and exclusion, access to programming, bullying and harassment, discrimination, civil-rights complaints, and enrollment.
The request expressly excludes personally identifiable student information; staff and employment settlements; collective-bargaining and employee grievance matters; personnel discipline and separation matters; workers’ compensation; vendor, procurement, construction, and property disputes; and unrelated commercial matters. Districts may redact student names and other legally protected identifiers.
A statewide comparison can help show how student-related disputes are resolved, what remedies are used, how districts respond to public-records requests, and whether recurring patterns emerge. We do not claim a pattern until records actually support it, and we clearly distinguish what was requested, what a district said, and what the produced records show.
Records library
Andover Public Schools — Partial
Received Oct. 6, 2026 from the district.
The production totals 14 documents.
The published copy is the version reviewed by Parent Data Force: student personally identifiable information was checked and redacted before posting. The district’s own file is not published.
Download the reviewed production: PII-reviewed public copy (PDF)
Ashland Public Schools — Partial
Received on or before October 13, 2026, the date this district’s tracker entry was last updated.
The production totals 14 documents.
This production is not published here. Parent Data Force’s own PII review found student-identifying material in it that should not be published, so it is withheld pending a fresh redaction from the district. The district’s own copy is held by the district.
Brockton Public Schools — Partial
Received Oct. 2, 2026 from the district.
The production totals 3 documents.
The published copy is the version reviewed by Parent Data Force: student personally identifiable information was checked and redacted before posting. The district’s own file is not published.
Download the reviewed production: PII-reviewed public copy (PDF)
Grafton Public Schools — Records received
Received Oct. 13, 2026 from the district.
The production totals 1 document.
The published copy is the version reviewed by Parent Data Force: student personally identifiable information was checked and redacted before posting. The district’s own file is not published.
Download the reviewed production: PII-reviewed public copy (PDF)
Holbrook Public Schools — Partial
Received Sept. 30, 2026 from the district.
The production totals 4 documents.
The published copy is the version reviewed by Parent Data Force: student personally identifiable information was checked and redacted before posting. The district’s own file is not published.
Download the reviewed production: PII-reviewed public copy (PDF)
Northborough-Southborough Public Schools — Records received
Received on or before October 7, 2026, the date this district’s tracker entry was last updated.
The production totals 24 documents.
This production is not published here. Parent Data Force’s own PII review found student-identifying material in it that should not be published, so it is withheld pending a fresh redaction from the district. The district’s own copy is held by the district.
Watertown Public Schools — Partial
Received Sept. 30, 2026 from the district.
The production totals 59 documents.
The published copy is the version reviewed by Parent Data Force: student personally identifiable information was checked and redacted before posting. The district’s own file is not published.
Download the reviewed production: PII-reviewed public copy (PDF)
Appeals & notable responses
Amesbury Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/3972)
Sept. 23, 2026 – Amesbury issued a $750 fee estimate and challenged portions of the request as insufficiently described; Parent Data Force appealed the same day. Determination issued Oct. 7, 2026 closed the appeal against the requestor, finding that the phrase ‘all final or executed student-related agreements resolving, compromising, settling, memorializing, or otherwise disposing of…’ does not reasonably describe the records sought under G.L. c. 66, s.10(a)(i) and Chawla, with clarification offered as the remedy after which the School must respond within ten business days. Reconsideration was requested the same day and the Supervisor opened SPR26/3972 for reconsideration on Oct. 7. Article: supervisor-rules-request-wording-unclear-spr26-3972
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 21, 2026) · District response (Sept. 23, 2026) · SPR appeal as filed (Sept. 23, 2026) · Amesbury’s $750 Estimate Is Now an Appeal · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · The Supervisor Held Our Wording Unclear: What SPR26/3972 Decides (covers Amesbury, with Dracut, Springfield and Tantasqua as comparator evidence)
Andover Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4258)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the district’s response to the Sept. 21, 2026 settlement-records request; no docket assigned yet. The district produced records the same day.
Source documents: District response letter and fee estimate (Oct. 6, 2026) · 183 Free Pages, Two Districts, and Why Neither Set Is Published · Four Districts, One Day, Four Different Answers (covers Andover, Grafton, Franklin, Plymouth) · Fourteen previously redacted settlement agreements received Oct. 6, 2026 – PII-reviewed public copy
Beverly Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4190)
Appeal docketed SPR26/4190 for no timely response to the Sept. 18 request. The District confirmed it never received the request and has begun processing. Oct. 20, 2026: the Supervisor closed the appeal, finding the School had provided a response on Oct. 5 and that SPR26/4190 had been opened only for the absence of a written response. The substance of the response may be appealed within ninety days.
Source documents: One Day, Four Districts: Five Days, Six Pages, a Closed Loop, and a Spam Folder (covers Shrewsbury, Grafton, Ashland and Beverly)
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4157 / SPR26/4166)
Fee estimate and time petition appealed (docketed SPR26/4157 and SPR26/4166).
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Brockton Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4173)
Fee and partial production appealed (docketed SPR26/4173): $312.50 charged for the 12.5 hours of segregation and redaction still required on roughly 150 pages.
Source documents: Redacted record 1 of 3 received Oct. 2, 2026 – PII-reviewed public copy · Signed settlement agreement received Oct. 2, 2026 – PII-reviewed public copy
Cambridge Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4251 / SPR26/4214)
Appealed the City’s fee petition Oct. 6, 2026 (our appeal docketed SPR26/4251). City petition determined Oct. 14, 2026 (SPR26/4214): 25-business-day extension granted and the City may assess a fee limited to $54.73 per hour. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4251 determination — declined to opine at this time; City’s Oct. 5 fee estimate must be revised in light of Oct. 14 determination; updated estimate appealable within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Four New Determinations in Three Days, and One Appeal That Never Was
Dracut Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4024)
Sept. 25, 2026 — Dracut issued a $2,950 fee estimate (45 agreements; 120 claimed hours at $25/hour after 2 free hours). Parent Data Force appealed the response to the Massachusetts Supervisor of Records the same day under G.L. c. 66, § 10A; the appeal is docketed as SPR26/4024 (acknowledged Sept. 25). The appeal challenges the estimate’s itemization and internal coherence.
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 21, 2026) · District fee-estimate response (letter dated Sept. 23, received Sept. 25, 2026) · SPR appeal as filed (Sept. 25, 2026) — docketed SPR26/4024 · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Dracut Wants $2,950 Before Anyone Sees Its 45 Agreements · Dracut’s $2,950 Estimate Is Now an Appeal · The Supervisor Held Our Wording Unclear: What SPR26/3972 Decides (covers Amesbury, with Dracut, Springfield and Tantasqua as comparator evidence)
East Bridgewater Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4069)
Petition determination issued Oct. 5, 2026 (SPR26/4069). Article: three-districts-same-75-dollar-ruling Appeal of the Sept. 28 response determined Oct. 14, 2026 (SPR26/4068): the $350 estimate was found sufficiently explained and the appeal closed. Reconsideration requested Oct. 14, 2026 and opened by the Supervisor the same day. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4069 determination — reconsideration denied: Supervisor declined to reverse the Oct. 5 determination; East Bridgewater’s fee justification not tailored; petitioner may seek judicial review.
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 18, 2026) · District fee-estimate response and fee-and-time petition (Sept. 28, 2026) · SPR appeal and petition opposition as filed (Sept. 28, 2026) · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · East Bridgewater’s $350 Fee and 30-Day Extension Are Now Under Appeal · Four New Determinations in Three Days, and One Appeal That Never Was · Three Districts, One Ruling: The Supervisor Caps Attorney Review Fees at $75 an Hour · Two Districts, One Petition: East Bridgewater and Natick Ask for 30 More Days in the Same Words
Fairhaven Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4261)
Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4261 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Fall River Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4188)
Appeal docketed SPR26/4188 for no timely response to the Sept. 18, 2026 request. Oct. 20, 2026: the Supervisor ordered the School to respond within ten business days, finding it unclear whether any response had been provided. The appeal remains open. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4188 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; appeal remains open (prior order).
Hopedale Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4171)
Fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4171): ~10 hours at $25/hour for search, compilation and redaction, up to $250. Town under 20,000, so the District charges the first two hours as well. Fee cannot be waived in full but will be adjusted to actual time. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4171 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Hopkinton Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4176)
Fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4176): 33 hours of segregation and redaction at $25/hour, or $483.25. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4176 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Hudson Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4174 / SPR26/4489)
Fee estimate and 30-day time petition appealed (docketed SPR26/4174): ~150 responsive pages; 2 hours search at $25 ($50) plus 32 hours review at $25 ($800) = $850. Fee waiver denied. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4174 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Lexington Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4256)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the $575 good-faith estimate; awaiting docket. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4256 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Methuen Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4132)
Appeal docketed SPR26/4132; closed without records or a compliant written response.
Source documents: JustFOIA request page showing PRR-2026-478 completed with no documents added · Methuen’s Sept. 30 response: approximately 45 responsive agreements identified and a $137.50 fee demanded before production · PRR-2026-478 correspondence: written request, portal confirmations, completion notice, and closed-request auto-response
Natick Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4044 / SPR26/4063 / SPR26/4324)
Petition determination issued Oct. 5, 2026 (SPR26/4044). Article: three-districts-same-75-dollar-ruling Substantive appeal of the District’s Sept. 28 response docketed Oct. 9, 2026 as SPR26/4324 (acknowledgment received Oct. 13, 2026). Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4324 determination — appeal closed: Supervisor will now consider this administrative appeal closed; judicial remedies remain available.
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 21, 2026) · District fee-estimate response (Sept. 28, 2026) · SPR appeal and petition opposition as filed (Sept. 28, 2026) · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Natick’s $275 Fee and 30-Day Extension Are Now Under Appeal · Three Districts, One Ruling: The Supervisor Caps Attorney Review Fees at $75 an Hour · Two Districts, One Petition: East Bridgewater and Natick Ask for 30 More Days in the Same Words
Newburyport Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4257)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the district’s Sept. 22, 2026 response to the settlement-records request; no docket assigned yet. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4257 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Northampton Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4259)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the district’s response to the Sept. 21, 2026 settlement-records request; no docket assigned yet. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4259 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Six Districts Answered on Oct. 7, and One Cut Its Own Fee to Zero
Peabody Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4527)
Sept. 25, 2026: the District invoiced $300 for 14 chargeable hours (14 gross less the two statutory free hours) at $25/hr, stating work begins on receipt of payment. Parent Data Force asked the District informally to justify the estimate. Oct. 20, 2026: the District denied the public-interest fee waiver as resting on a “generalized statement” and raised the estimate to $350.00 — approximately 47 responsive agreements, 16 gross hours less two free hours at $25/hr, an unexplained 20.42 minutes per agreement with no page count, pages-per-agreement figure or sampling method. Parent Data Force appealed both estimates and the waiver denial to the Supervisor of Records the same morning, and furnished the Sept. 25 response and its two attachments at the Division’s request. The Supervisor docketed the appeal SPR26/4527 and assigned it to staff for review the same day.
Source documents: District response letter + invoice (Sept. 25, 2026) · District response letter — fee waiver denial + $350 estimate (Oct. 20, 2026) · Peabody Wants $300 Before It Looks
Quincy Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4087)
Petition determination issued Oct. 6, 2026 (SPR26/4087): 30-business-day extension granted; attorney review approved but capped at $75.00 per hour, every other task held to $25 per hour, and the request found non-commercial. Reconsideration was requested Oct. 6 limited strictly to the $75-per-hour attorney-review rate – the extension is not challenged – and on Oct. 7 the Supervisor opened SPR26/4087 for reconsideration. Article: three-districts-same-75-dollar-ruling
Source documents: District response: $450 fee estimate + fee/time petition (Sept. 29, 2026) · Opposition to fee/time petition + Section 10A appeal — SPR26/4087 (Sept. 29, 2026) · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Three Districts, One Ruling: The Supervisor Caps Attorney Review Fees at $75 an Hour
Shrewsbury Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4207)
District located ~14 responsive documents; estimated 1.5 hours, so no fee will be assessed. Filed a petition for additional time to produce (docketed SPR26/4207). Petition determination issued Oct. 13, 2026 (SPR26/4207): good cause found; the School is granted an extension of 5 business days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · One Day, Four Districts: Five Days, Six Pages, a Closed Loop, and a Spam Folder (covers Shrewsbury, Grafton, Ashland and Beverly)
Silver Lake Regional School District — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4253)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the district’s Sept. 23, 2026 response to the settlement-records request; no docket assigned yet. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4253 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
Somerset Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4099)
Sept. 30: Somerset’s response (letter dated Sept. 23, received Sept. 30) carries a fee estimate and the district’s own fee-and-time petition — docket SPR26/4099, acknowledged by the SEC the same day. The petition seeks a $75/hour counsel rate, about 10 additional search hours on ~1,000 responsive pages/documents, and 30 extra business days; it also bills review to ‘the invoices sought in the request’ though no invoices were requested. Parent Data Force filed an opposition and a Section 10A appeal the same day, citing Hohler v. Sharon Public Schools (SPR25/1092) against the $75 rate.
Source documents: Fee estimate + fee/time petition, letter dated Sept. 23 (received Sept. 30, 2026) · Opposition to fee/time petition + Section 10A appeal — SPR26/4099 (Sept. 30, 2026) · Somerset’s Fee-and-Time Petition Is Now SPR26/4099
Springfield Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4255)
Appeal filed Oct. 6, 2026 against the $700 good-faith estimate; awaiting docket. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4255 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · The Supervisor Held Our Wording Unclear: What SPR26/3972 Decides (covers Amesbury, with Dracut, Springfield and Tantasqua as comparator evidence)
Swansea Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4382)
Fee estimate issued Oct. 6, 2026 ($500, 20 hrs); District revised it Oct. 13, 2026 to $325 (13 hrs at $25/hr) after Parent Data Force narrowed the period; both estimates appealed Oct. 13, 2026. Docketed SPR26/4382 (acknowledgment received Oct. 14, 2026, assigned to Staff Attorney Barbara Durgin). Determination issued Oct. 15, 2026: the appeal was closed as a result of the District’s further Oct. 15 response, whose substance the Supervisor’s office noted may be appealed within 90 days.
Source documents: District revised fee estimate (Oct. 13, 2026) · District supplemental explanation to the Supervisor (Oct. 15, 2026) · SPR appeal as filed (Oct. 13, 2026) – both estimates; docketed SPR26/4382 · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Four New Determinations in Three Days, and One Appeal That Never Was
Wakefield Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4271 / SPR26/4277)
Oct. 8: the Supervisor acknowledged our appeal of the District’s response and our opposition to the District’s fee and time petition (docketed SPR26/4277 and SPR26/4271). Petition determination issued Oct. 14, 2026 (SPR26/4271): 30-business-day extension granted, and the attorney-review rate approved up to $75.00 per hour. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4277 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Four New Determinations in Three Days, and One Appeal That Never Was · Six Districts Answered on Oct. 7, and One Cut Its Own Fee to Zero
Waltham Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4170)
Categorical withholding and fee appealed (docketed SPR26/4170): District estimated 7.3 hours to redact 24 agreements; first 2 hours free, 5.3 hours at $25 = $132.50, payable before production. Cites Champa and undertakes to produce redacted copies. Oct. 26, 2026: SPR26/4170 determination — ordered to respond within 10 business days; may appeal substantive response within 90 days.
Westfield Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4111 / SPR26/4117)
Fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4117); District’s response reduced the estimate to $87.50.
Source documents: Fee estimate & time petition letter (City Solicitor’s Office, Sept. 30) · Requester rebuttal & appeal letter (Sept. 30) · SEC acknowledgment of District fee & time petition SPR26/4111 (determination due Oct. 7) · SEC acknowledgment of requester appeal SPR26/4117 (determination due Oct. 14) · Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request · Six Districts Answered on Oct. 7, and One Cut Its Own Fee to Zero
Westwood Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4078)
Sept. 29, 2026 — Westwood’s School Department assessed a $520 fee (13 hours at $40/hour) for request #2026-0280 and placed the request on hold pending payment, despite its own Sept. 23 acknowledgment capping the rate at $25/hour. Parent Data Force appealed under G.L. c. 66, § 10A the same day. Docket pending. Appeal determined by the Supervisor of Records on Oct. 14, 2026 (SPR26/4078): the School must revise its $300 fee estimate or further explain how it is consistent with G.L. c. 66, § 10(d), and must respond accordingly within ten business days.
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 23, 2026) · District fee estimate (Sept. 29, 2026) · SPR appeal as filed (Sept. 29, 2026) · Westwood Quoted Itself $25 an Hour, Then Billed $40
Weymouth Public Schools — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4062)
Sept. 28, 2026 — Weymouth’s School Department identified about 30 potentially responsive records and assessed a $350 fee (12 redaction/review hours + 1 search hour + 1 final-preparation hour), warning the request would be deemed withdrawn without payment within 20 business days. Parent Data Force appealed under G.L. c. 66, § 10A the same day; the appeal is docketed as SPR26/4062. Determination issued Oct. 13, 2026: the School must revise the estimate or explain how $350 is consistent with G.L. c. 66, § 10(d); the 12 hours of redaction work inside it may not be charged absent a petition under § 10(d)(iv); a specific per-page or per-record time estimate is required rather than a range.
Source documents: Original public records request (Sept. 23, 2026) · District response and fee estimate (Sept. 28, 2026) · SPR appeal as filed (Sept. 28, 2026) — docketed SPR26/4062 · Weymouth’s $350 Estimate Ordered Revised, and the Redaction Hours Struck Out: SPR26/4062 · Weymouth’s $350 Portal Fee Is Now an Appeal
Whitman-Hanson Regional School District — fee estimate appealed (docketed SPR26/4165 / SPR26/4161)
Fee estimate and time petition appealed (docketed SPR26/4161 and SPR26/4165).
Source documents: Districts Have Demanded $44,641 to Answer One Records Request
What happens when records arrive
When a district produces records, each production goes through the same process before it appears on this page:
- Received — the production is logged for the district.
- Privacy/relevance review — the production is checked against the request scope and for student personally identifiable information.
- Indexed and summarized — agreements are organized by district and summarized factually.
- Published with source documents — reviewed records are posted here with their sources.
Records are reviewed before public posting to ensure student personally identifiable information is not inadvertently exposed — names, addresses, student IDs, dates of birth, and unique details that could re-identify a child. District redactions are not assumed to be sufficient on their own.
Legal context
The request invokes the Massachusetts Public Records Law, G.L. c. 66, § 10, and its implementing regulation, 950 C.M.R. 32.00. For special-education settlement agreements, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Champa v. Weston Public Schools, 473 Mass. 86 (2015), requires disclosure of properly redacted settlement agreements once personally identifying information is removed. The Supervisor of Records applied Champa in SPR17/661, Alexander v. Wellesley Public Schools (2017), and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has stated publicly that special-education settlement agreements are public records once stripped of all personally identifiable information.
The existence of a settlement does not prove wrongdoing, and a missed expected date on this tracker does not by itself mean a district violated the law. A response can be an acknowledgment, a fee estimate, a lawful extension, a production schedule, or a complete production. This page reports what was requested, what each district said, and what the produced records show.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly are you asking districts for?
Final or executed written agreements that resolve student-related educational disputes, including settlements, resolution agreements, MOUs/MOAs, mediation agreements, stipulations, side agreements, and material amendments or addenda.
Are you asking for student names?
No. The request expressly says Parent Data Force is not requesting personally identifiable student information.
Why track this statewide?
Comparing districts can show how student disputes are being resolved, what remedies appear, how transparent districts are, and whether recurring patterns emerge. Any conclusions should be based on the records actually produced.
Can I request my district?
Yes. Email joey@parentdataforce.com with the district name and municipality. No student information is needed.
Can I use the request myself?
Yes. The full template is provided on the page so families, journalists, researchers, and community members can adapt it.
What does “expected response” mean?
It is the current response milestone tracked for the request. It does not necessarily mean all records will be produced by that date; a response may include an acknowledgment, fee estimate, extension, production schedule, or other legally permitted response.
Will you publish everything you receive?
Records should be reviewed first. The project should not publish student-identifying information or material that should remain private.
What happens if a district does not respond?
The project follows up with the district. If no adequate response follows, the next step is an appeal to the Supervisor of Public Records under G.L. c. 66, § 10A — the route this project has used elsewhere.
How can I report a correction?
Email joey@parentdataforce.com and identify the district and the information you believe needs to be corrected.
Help expand the project. Request a district, share the page, and check back as records are published.
Email joey@parentdataforce.com to request a district or report a correction.